There
is one amazing and thoughtful review of this product, a review that gives it 1
star and is titled “From the point of view of an actual Korean & Adopted person...” wherein
Amazon Customer Reviewer Amie Kim writes,
“Yes, I'm an actual person who was affected by this legalized child trafficking deal they call "adoption" - no longer an idealized baby or helpless child. Warning: your adopted children will grow up to have their own opinions, and it's more than likely if you purchase this item, they will have a low opinion of you.
Not only is the imagery offensive to my sensibilities as a person who was adopted from Korea to the U.S., but it's Just. Plain. Bad. Design. It looks like it was thrown together in the mid-90s by a person who just discovered desktop publishing for the first time.
And jeez, the "oriental" font? What are we, Chinese take-out?”
In
my opinion, this ornament is UGLY because it has a very offensive whitewashing
of race, and of the history of U.S.-Korea relations. So, some prospective adoptive
parents are waiting for a “good THING” in the form of a Korean baby (not a
thing, not not not a “thing” – we are talking about a human child whose rights
must be enforced), to arrive in America, hangs this ornament at Christmas. What
an allegory for erasing identity and commodifying a human being.
I
view this as racist whitewashing on two:
First,
it is racist by assuming a Korean child or the boundaries of Korea (represented
by the map of Korea) can be simply “absorbed” into the U.S. (as symbolized by
the U.S. map surrounding or consuming the Korean map. It isn’t like this is
topographically accurate, so why is Korea placed INSIDE of the U.S. as opposed
to alongside or above).
By
placing Korea inside the U.S., America is symbolically put in an unquestionably
superior position to Korea. This positioning further erases or ignores all of
the opposition that exists in Korea – now and throughout history – to the
circumstances political, social and economic that give rise to the abrogation
of children’s rights in the current and historic adoption regime; to political,
cultural and historic tensions in KORUS relations; and also ignores the
allegory for conquest, colonization, annexation represented by this imagery.
Second,
the racist allegory bothers me because of the historical repetition of the
absorption of American Indians into American founding mythology. I personally resonate
with this issue because my own ancestor was stolen from her mother by a system
that forcefully placed American Indian children with white families (and
thereby distanced her from me and my family not only by time/generation but
also by a coerced adoption that strips my family of kin, history and heritage).
Further, even contemporary U.S. politics refuse to acknowledge and address the
decades of forced sterilization of Black women, American Indian women and
“socially undesirable” women. Maybe because as a person with privilege I also
grew up feeling close to this personal family story of genocide because I (or
my grandmother, maybe not exactly/directly me) was robbed of a mother (my
great-great-grandmother) that our family and future generations can never ever know.
So it hurts me to imagine a child seeing this ornament on a Christmas tree and
it hurts me to imagine the seemingly willful ignorance that went into the
creation of this product.
Please
join our discussion of Single Parenthood in South Korea on the Korean Gender Cafe. Better yet,
anyone interested can visit TRACK’s site and read the entire report critiquing the human rights violations in the current system of adoption from Korea or join
the Korea Gender Café in listening to and supporting the inspiring people at TRACK, ASK, KUMSN and KUMFA and many others whom
help us be more a more thoughtful international society.
No comments:
Post a Comment